All posts tagged: restrains

Karnataka High Court restrains transport unions from resorting to strike on May 20

Karnataka High Court restrains transport unions from resorting to strike on May 20

A vacation Division Bench of Justice Suraj Govindraj and Justice K. Manmadha Rao passed the interim order on a PIL petition. File | Photo Credit: The Hindu The High Court of Karnataka on Tuesday (May 19, 2026) restrained the transport unions from resorting to strike on May 20 , and directed continuation of meeting with the State authority’s for resolution of grievances. A vacation Division Bench of Justice Suraj Govindraj and Justice K. Manmadha Rao passed the interim order on a PIL petition filed by C. Vedavathi, a house maid, and another construction worker claiming that their livelihood would be impacted if bus services are not available.  While adjourning further hearing on the petition till next week, the court orally noted the government’s claim that substantial demands of the unions have been already met with by releasing necessary funds. Published – May 19, 2026 12:03 pm IST Disclaimer: We do not own any of the content, ideas, images, or text presented here. All rights belong to their respective owners. For more information and to view …

Madras HC restrains TVK leader from confidence vote

Madras HC restrains TVK leader from confidence vote

The Madras High Court on Tuesday restrained TVK candidate Srinivasa Sethupathi from participating in the Assembly confidence vote scheduled to take place later in the day. Madras High Court passed the interim order on a plea moved by former DMK minister Periyakaruppan who lost to TVK candidate by one vote. The order came while hearing a petition filed by former Tamil Nadu Minister KR Periyakaruppan, who sought to restrain Sethupathi from assuming office as an MLA over allegations that a postal ballot vote had been altered. According to the plea, a vote that was meant to be recorded in Tirupattur Constituency No. 185 was allegedly transferred to Tirupattur Constituency No. 50 in Vellore district. Periyakaruppan approached the High Court after the Election Commission allegedly failed to take action on the complaint. During the hearing, the Election Commission submitted that, as per the rules, no action was required if a complaint regarding postal ballot discrepancies was received after the commencement of vote counting. The Commission also stated that not a single postal vote had been transferred …

Postal ballot dispute: Madras HC restrains Tiruppattur MLA-elect from floor test

Postal ballot dispute: Madras HC restrains Tiruppattur MLA-elect from floor test

The Madras High Court in an interim order on Tuesday restrained Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) candidate Seenivasa Sethupathi, who won from the Tiruppattur constituency in Tamil Nadu assembly elections, from participating in the state legislative assembly, floor test and confidence motion on May 13. A detailed order of the court is awaited. (File Photo) A bench of justices L Victoria Gowri and N Senthil Kumar in an interim order, restrained Sethupathi following a dispute over a postal ballot from the Tiruppattur assembly constituency. The Election Commission of India (ECI) told the court on Monday that the poll body had no jurisdiction to act on Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) leader KR Periyakaruppan’s complaint over a disputed postal ballot after the declaration of results. Periyakaruppan moved the high court last week claiming that the election officials wrongly sent a postal ballot to another Tiruppattur constituency in Tirupattur instead of Sivagangai district, causing it to be rejected there. Periyakaruppan lost by 83,374 votes, a margin of just one vote. He argued that if the ballot was valid and …

Madras High Court restrains unlawful broadcasting of The Kerala Story 2

Madras High Court restrains unlawful broadcasting of The Kerala Story 2

The controversial film The Kerala Story 2, directed by Kamakhya Narayan Singh and produced by Vipul Shah, was released in theatres on February 28. After a back-and-forth legal battle at the Kerala High Court, the film was allowed a theatrical release on the evening of February 28. Madras HC restrains unlawful broadcasting of film On March 3, the Madras High Court restrained internet service providers and cable TV operators from unlawfully broadcasting the film. According to a report in The Indian Express, Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy passed the interim order in two applications filed by the film’s producer, Sunshine Pictures Limited, which apprehended copyright infringement ahead of the release. The court noted that, as evidence of copyright ownership, the producer-plaintiff submitted the CBFC certificate identifying it as the producer. The court observed, “In matters of this nature, it is likely that irreversible injury will occur unless unlawful broadcast is prevented at the threshold. At the same time, it is possible that the legitimate business interests of one or more respondents may be affected, in view of …

Bombay HC protects Shatrughan Sinha’s ‘Khamosh’, restrains AI and digital misuse

Bombay HC protects Shatrughan Sinha’s ‘Khamosh’, restrains AI and digital misuse

The Bombay High Court has moved to protect the personality rights of veteran actor and politician Shatrughan Sinha, ruling that his iconic dialogue “Khamosh” is exclusively associated with his public persona and cannot be used without authorization. The interim order restrains individuals and online platforms from misusing his name, image, voice, or distinctive style, particularly for commercial purposes or through artificial intelligence generated content. Shatrughan Sinha`s khamosh gets a ruling The order was passed by Justice Sharmila Deshmukh, who observed that Sinha’s trademark dialogue delivery and screen presence are inseparably linked to his identity in the public domain. The court agreed that unauthorized usage of these attributes amounts to a violation of his personality rights and could potentially harm his reputation and goodwill. Sinha had approached the court alleging widespread misuse of his identity across digital platforms. His legal team argued that his famous catchphrase and unique style have become symbolic of his persona over decades in cinema and public life. The court recognized that such distinctive elements deserve protection under the law, especially in …

Delhi HC Restrains Ilaiyaraaja From Using 134 Songs In Copyright Row | Tamil Cinema News

Delhi HC Restrains Ilaiyaraaja From Using 134 Songs In Copyright Row | Tamil Cinema News

Last Updated:February 17, 2026, 03:43 IST A Delhi High Court interim order restrains Ilaiyaraaja from using or licensing certain songs, after Saregama claimed rights over works tied to 134 films. Ilaiyaraaja is among the most celebrated musicians in India. Renowned composer Ilaiyaraaja has landed in legal trouble after the Delhi High Court issued an interim order restraining him from using or licensing certain musical works claimed by Saregama India Limited. The directive, delivered earlier this month, bars the veteran from exploiting recordings and compositions whose rights are asserted by the company. According to a report by Bar and Bench, Justice Tushar Rao Gedela issued an ex-parte ad-interim injunction observing that Saregama could suffer irreparable losses if the composer continued to commercially exploit the works. The order prevents him from issuing licences, using the material or making ownership claims before third parties regarding the listed recordings and compositions. Court order impacts music tied to 134 films The ruling is significant as it concerns music connected to 134 films associated with Ilaiyaraaja’s decades-long career. It also covers …

Delhi High Court restrains Deepika Padukone’s brand from using Lotus Splash mark for its face cleanser

Delhi High Court restrains Deepika Padukone’s brand from using Lotus Splash mark for its face cleanser

Actor Deepika Padukone‘s company DPKA Universal Consumer Ventures has faced fresh trouble after Lotus Herbals sued the actor and her company for trademark infringement. The case alleged that ‘Lotus Splash’ is similar to their ‘Lotus’ mark. Deepika Padukone and her company have been sued for trademark infringement. The latest update from Bar and Bench states that on Monday, the Delhi High Court passed an interim order restraining Deepika’s company DPKA Universal Consumer Ventures from using the mark ‘Lotus Splash’ for its facewash/ face cleanser product. Deepika’s self-care brand 82°E sells a face cleanser named Lotus Splash. What was the court statement? It was detailed that a Division Bench of Justices V Kameswar Rao and Vinod Kumar have rendered a prima facie finding that the Lotus Splash mark was similar to the lotus mark of another cosmetic and beauty products company, Lotus Herbals Private Limited. The bench overruled a single-judge’s order of January 25, 2024, which had refused an injunction against the actor. In a statement, the Bench said, “We allow the application [for interim injunction]. …

Bombay HC restrains Marathi actor Vidnyan Mane from making defamatory remarks against Palash Muchhal

Bombay HC restrains Marathi actor Vidnyan Mane from making defamatory remarks against Palash Muchhal

Music composer and singer Palash Muchhal, who was recently in the news after his wedding with batter Smriti Mandhana was called off, has found some relief regarding a suit. As per the latest update from news agency PTI, the Bombay High Court has restrained actor-producer Vidnyan Mane from making defamatory remarks against the composer. Palash Muchhal has composed music for several songs, such as Tu Hi Hai Aashiqui and Naach Basanti. Palash Muchhal gets relief in suit A bench of Justice Milind Jadhav, in its February 11 order, noted that Vidnyan Mane’s comments were “prima facie insinuating and per se defamatory”. Palash has filed a suit against Mane seeking damages and a permanent injunction for making defamatory statements against him and his family. “The defendant (Mane) is restrained from making any further references and insinuations of the kind and nature attacking the plaintiff (Muchhal) and his mother, which are made in the said interviews, which are prima facie defamatory,” the court said. The composer’s advocates Siddesh Bhole and Shreyansh Mitare had submitted to the court …

Bombay High Court restrains Vidnyan Mane from defaming Palash Muchhal, says comments are ‘prima facie defamatory’  | Bollywood News

Bombay High Court restrains Vidnyan Mane from defaming Palash Muchhal, says comments are ‘prima facie defamatory’  | Bollywood News

4 min readMumbaiFeb 14, 2026 01:49 PM IST Palash Muchhal first attracted media attention following the cancellation of his wedding with Indian cricketer Smriti Mandhana. This led to reports suggesting he had been allegedly unfaithful to Mandhana. Soon after, allegations emerged that Palash had cheated film producer Vidnyan Mane of over Rs 40 lakh, reportedly linked to an investment in an unreleased film. The situation escalated when, days after filing a police complaint, Vidnyan spoke to the media, revealing details about Palash’s alleged infidelity towards Smriti. Now, as the matter concerning the financial dispute remains under judicial consideration, the Bombay High Court, according to news agency PTI, has restrained Vidnyan from making defamatory remarks against Palash. A bench led by Justice Milind Jadhav, on February 11, noted that Vidnyan’s comments were “prima facie insinuating and per se defamatory.” “The defendant (Vidnyan Mane) is restrained from making any further references and insinuations of the kind and nature attacking the plaintiff (Palash Muchhal) and his mother, which are made in the said interviews, which are prima facie …

Mumbai Court Restrains CarryMinati From Posting Defamatory Content Against Karan Johar

Mumbai Court Restrains CarryMinati From Posting Defamatory Content Against Karan Johar

Mumbai court has temporarily restrained YouTuber Ajey Nagar, also known as CarryMinati, along with talent manager Deepak Char and others, from posting or sharing any defamatory content against filmmaker Karan Johar on social media. The order was issued by Principal Sessions Judge PG Bhonsale on February 9 after Johar moved court through Apoorva Mehta, CEO of Dharma Productions.   In his plea, Johar alleged that certain statements made in the influencers’ YouTube videos were defamatory and damaging to his reputation. The petition stated, “The statements are so vulgar and abusive that they immediately needs to be taken down.” While Nagar’s side argued that the videos had already been removed and therefore there was no reason for Johar to approach the court, the filmmaker countered that the content had already reached a massive audience. Johar further submitted that even though the original videos were taken down, the issue had not ended. “Unknown persons are making reels of it and again circulating it in the social media,” he argued, pointing out that the clips had been viewed …