All posts tagged: violative

‘Bad, illegal & violative’: Gujarat HC slams retrospective use of 2023 Exam Anti-Cheating Law in 2017 | Ahmedabad News

‘Bad, illegal & violative’: Gujarat HC slams retrospective use of 2023 Exam Anti-Cheating Law in 2017 | Ahmedabad News

4 min readVadodaraMay 21, 2026 12:22 AM IST STATING THAT invoking an Act in retrospective effect was “bad, illegal and violative” of the fundamental rights of an accused, the Gujarat High Court recently quashed charges under the Gujarat Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2023, against an accused who allegedly allowed a dummy candidate to appear on his behalf in a 2017 examination for the post of Junior Clerk – held six years before the law came into existence. Justice Vimal Vyas of the Gujarat HC was hearing a petition filed  by Mahesh Chauhan, who was booked under the 2023 Act for the incident that dates back to 2017, in which Chauhan is accused of having arranged for a dummy candidate, named Kalpesh Jani, to appear on his behalf in the examination conducted on February 12, 2017 for the posts of Junior Clerk. Contending that he was not named in the original FIR filed at Bhavnagar police station, which was registered in 2023 – 11 years after the date of the similar alleged offence …

‘Attempt to Obstruct Woman’s Right to Motherhood Violative of Fundamental Rights’: Rajasthan HC on Maternity Leave

Reported By: Ananya Singh Last Updated: September 11, 2024, 13:59 IST The court underscored the importance of early parenthood and the need for adequate maternity leave, asserting that maternity Leave is not just a benefit but a right. (Getty Image for Representation) The court, while directing the employer to amend its regulation in order to provide 180 days maternity leave to all employees, said ensuring the health of both the mother and her newborn is vital The Rajasthan High Court has ruled that denying a female government employee 180 days of maternity leave constitutes a violation of her fundamental rights. The court emphasised that obstructing a woman’s ability to exercise her right of motherhood not only infringes on constitutional and statutory protections but also contradicts principles of social justice. Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand, presiding over the court, ruled in favour of the government employee who was a conductor under the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (RSRTC) and was initially granted only 90 days of leave from her department under Regulation 74 of the RSRTC Employees …