2 min readMumbaiUpdated: May 13, 2026 09:42 PM IST
The Bombay High Court on Wednesday disposed of a petition after it was withdrawn, the petition challenged the constitution of the Sir Ratan Tata Trust (SRTT) and sought a stay on a meeting of the trustees. A vacation bench of Justice Advait Sethna and Justice Sandesh Patil noted that while the stay was sought on the basis of a claim that a representation was made before the charity commissioner, the petitioner was not a complainant.
Last week, the court had refused to grant an urgent hearing on a plea seeking a restraining order on the trustees from passing or implementing any decision arising out of or connected with its proposed board meeting.
The petitioner, a 61-year-old Thane resident, Suresh Patilkhede, had claimed that the premier public charitable trust is in violation of a 2025 amendment to the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act that caps the number of life trustees.
The petition said that the number of life trustees at any point cannot exceed one-fourth of the total number of trustees as per the Act but out of a total of six trustees, three were life trustees.
Patilkhede had submitted before the court that he had emailed the charity commissioner through his lawyers on April 18, 2026 but no action or inquiry was initiated. Upon inquiry, the court learned that Patilkhede did not make the representation to the commissioner, to which the bench expressed displeasure.
The petitioner stated that the Trust has six trustees: Jimmy Naval Tata, Jehangir H C Jehangir, Noel Naval Tata, Venu Srinivasan, Vijay Singh, and senior advocate Darius Khambata. Of these, three are continuing as life trustees, he claimed, adding that this was “contrary to the mandatory statutory limit” on the number of life trustees.
Lawyers for the board members had opposed the petition stating that a notification was issued to state that the 2025 amendment could not be applied retrospectively.
© The Indian Express Pvt Ltd
Disclaimer: We do not own any of the content, ideas, images, or text presented here. All rights belong to their respective owners. For more information and to view the original source, please visit the following link: